Quote from: Despairo on Today at 03:28:47 AM

Quote from: rby on Today at 03:10:10 AM

The irony of the matter is that even the bbigtart haven't received any merits for the scam catch at Duelbits thread, rather the merits all came to this thread.

I've merited him for you Wink

Welldone, I have also dropped a merit with the user and I also saw more from others.

Quote from: Despairo on Today at 03:28:47 AM

I think this is because of the private spreadsheet usage, we're not a BetterCallRaul participants, so we don't have any clue who are the active participants. It's true the campaign manager will let know the removed/left participants and the new accepted participants, but it's not convenient to browse each post rather than give it into one list.

If it's about privacy matter, I don't think it's harm for just show the active participants, he can remove the address etc.

Although, I have worked under Royse777 for Mixero which also is a private spreadsheet campaign. Every week the manager publishes the name of the campaign participants in the campaign thread and it is public for anyone to view. The center of privacy in such campaigns is just the wallet address.
I trust Royse777 innovation prowess in campaign management but I am yet to figure out why he implemented this private spreadsheet method.
Some cheating alts are being bursted with address connections, but if these addresses are semi accessible, it might shield a cheat for some period of time.

Quote from: Poker Player on Today at 03:32:20 AM

Good job Bitcoin_Arena and nutildah.

I have tagged the alts I have seen that had only one negative tag and there was even one that only had a neutral tag by JG. Mostly because maybe with only one negative tag the managers might let it pass but being the tag for this they shouldn't if they check the reference.

Can you link me to this user's alt? let me add to it.