Quote from: ares-austria on Today at 06:25:38 AM

Note that this promise on Dynex' part is referring to the infrastructure, where as the Cambrian explosion of AI in the recent months has been on the application level. Also regarding the promises, look up the references to MemComputing Inc technology vs. Dynex claims from the earlier posts on this thread.

Also add in the history of Daniel Mattes, the likely identity of Dynex lead "Sumitomo": This Founder [Daniel Mattes] Just Agreed to Pay $17 Million to Settle a Fraud Charge. Now He’s Heading an A.I. Startup. That A.I. Startup is also now defunct after failing to deliver on promises. Maybe this time it is different.

Oh, please. Give me a break.

You can't say that for many years now the SEC hasn't operated as a quasi protection racket for the US gov. If you can't recognize that, why are you even in crypto? Musk is best known, among many others, for publicly saying as much.

They operate with in-house judges. You can't fight them. And the case you've posted yet again... there are so many absent details. Still, on top of that, the SEC forces the accused to sign a gag order so they can't defend themselves in public.

Get a grip man.

Setting aside your passive aggression yet again, I would have agreed the Dynex PyTorch would be a great time to reveal since it will probably be very hands on.

Again, for your own credibility, feel free to tell us how you and your friends are personally driven to spend hours sniping at a small-time project at the exclusion of all others.