Quote from: AbuBhakar on May 21, 2023, 11:40:43 AM

Quote from: slapper on May 21, 2023, 11:05:44 AM

Quote from: AbuBhakar on May 20, 2023, 03:24:45 PM

Quote from: ddaddic on May 20, 2023, 11:10:44 AM

I would appreciate it if someone could explain to me the purpose of referrals if friends are not allowed to play the same promotion at the casino simultaneously. Are referred people automatically labeled as a "group," gangsters, organized abusers?

There’s nothing wrong on inviting your friend through referral but having same IP address and some sort of similarities in the account pattern doesn’t categorized as friends since it a digital evidence of having a multiple account. You should read the terms if you are sincerely playing with friends to avoid such kind of trouble on multiple account which the casino is very strict due to their bonus.

There’s a lot of abuser in the past that do the same as yours that abused a certain game on the casino and manage to withdraw profits. Your action same with other account involves shows like you are in group as you already admit that you refer them therefore you are really what the representative describing. It’s normal that you are tagged as abusers if you benefits on same bonus, same game using same IP. What kind of excuse can you use to erase that thinking against you and your “friends”.?

Sure as sunrise, multiple casino accounts from the same IP address will make you squint suspiciously. But, hold your horses! What about those blissful, innocent scenarios where folks, like dorm buddies or the Brady Bunch, are just jazzing up their evenings with a little online casino razzle-dazzle? Talk about a brain-teaser!

Yes, we've got to keep our eyes peeled for those crafty rule-benders from the past. But let's not throw a net of suspicion over every case that smells remotely fishy. Maybe we need to jazz things up a little – how about a slicker system to tell the black sheep from the white? Picture this: a high-tech mix of location sleuthing and biometric auth?

Now, let's swivel our spotlight to the big screen of communication. Could the problem be that the fine print wasn't as clear as crystal ball predictions? Do casinos need to drop the lawyer lingo and speak plain Jane? What if our dear players were just innocently out of the loop, and not on a rule-breaking spree?

Then how do you proposed to investigate whether they are telling the truth or not for having bros instead of multiple account despite the fact of connection with IP? KYC? Nah, This will make abuser purchased random KYC from other people that willing to be paid.

The chance of your assumption being correct is being slim compared to the damage that in be done if someone abused the casino bonus and use your excuse every time they are busted. I pointed out already the ToS about the strict warning on multiple account. If you read that carefully, You will be cautious on letting someone in your family to be involved on same casino due to this bold warning.

Innocent or not. There’s a bunch of this scenario that abusers use this excuse to getaway. You can visit scam accusation for same issue and count a casino that allowed this kind of excuse. I know you are trying to be fair be think exactly what’s gonna be the impact in bigger picture if this excuse was accepted by the casino.

@AbuBhakar no casino should allow this because it’ll set an bad precedent which will allow many scammer’s to use this plea and get away by scamming the casino. Furthermore I understand some user’s may actually be innocent but why in the world were these user’s using a common IP why not use their own IP and avoid this unnecessary scenario and thus I completely support the casino's in their decision to block these user’s.