Quote from: LUCKMCFLY on June 06, 2023, 11:23:38 PM

Quote from: Strongkored on May 22, 2023, 07:11:54 AM

Quote from: LUCKMCFLY on May 22, 2023, 02:18:51 AM

The truth is, I didn't know that now they are Considering holding the World Cups in that way with the union of these three countries, now, how are 3 countries starting in this next World Cup that happen to have several different things, in terms of culture and even in the way After entering their countries, we will see how they Manage it, of course, I am sure that each Country will help one and the other so that everything looks good, and there are no problems, because where 1 country fails, they are given the responsibility of 50- 50 for the other two that remain,but that would look very bad, and I would not agree, because a World Cup Means many good things.

The implementation carried out by the three countries is a mutual agreement, and the three of them will definitely accept the number of matches based on their capabilities because this will be based on the infrastructure that each country has, also this will be the first World Cup with the number of participants increasing quite a lot so that the number of participants attending will be more as well as the number of spectators who will be directly present at the stadium.

It seems that the holding of the World Cup by several countries will become a trend in the future, because several countries that have registered to be able to host the 2030 World Cup are inviting their neighbors to become joint organizers, from the list only Morocco has volunteered without inviting other countries.
Even Saudi Arabia, which is very ambitious to be elected, invites Egypt and Greece to join the bid, three countries on different continents but they don't have a long distance and this might be a new history and maybe they will be chosen considering that 2030 will be the 100th anniversary of the World Cup so it will show the best different, but Uruguay and South American countries are also interested in getting it because they were the first host countries in 1930.
https://theathletic.com/3656183/2022/10/05/2030-world-cup-host-options/

Well, it is not a bad thing that they make this initiative, as long as what is needed is that you can enjoy a good show and that the fútbol that is generated is clean and with the best technology, because I have seen that the VAR and the The new referee shortlist has ways of continuing with corruption , so technology for me is essential for it to be done , because cheating is one of the things that is always seen in football and well, almost in all sports, because With what Argentina won, it is said that FIFA gave them everything , because that type of commentator is on the networks , memes and everything , things are currently like that.

Building joint ventures so to say in order to submit applications to host the World Cup will also take place more often because if there is one "union" consisting of three countries applying for a World Cup and all other applicants are standalone applications, there is of course also a bigger lobby behind that union (unless it is the USA alone). But the approach to giving the tournament to several countries at once is probably more popular among society than just giving it to one country every four years. In terms of equality and also integration globally between countries this approach can only help. But infrastructure is the most basic issue here as bigger World Cups need more infrastructure. Still the USA could have done it alone, but perhaps Mexico would have had problems alone and therefore they plan beforehand to get smaller, less equipped nations under the roof of the bigger ones in a timely manner.

As you said, as long as the tournament is enjoyable and going well, I am also all or it. But I expect a great World Cup 2026. Not many reasons speak against it.