Quote from: rby on May 17, 2023, 06:07:53 AM

Quote from: Helena Yu on May 17, 2023, 05:22:05 AM

Quote from: robelneo on May 17, 2023, 04:49:55 AM

I don't have merits to give anymore but I left him positive feedback

I suggest you to reconsider your feedback, I would say neutral feedback is more appropriate in this case.

I think I disagree with you on this;

I'm with Helena on this one: catching a cheater doesn't mean the user can be trusted. There was no amount risked.

Quote

There was a user who wanted to pay for evil fee or copper membership, but theymos mistakenly sent him some btc, as new as s/he was and having joined the forum with a concealed ip, s/he chosed to return the btc. He recieved enough positive feedbacks without waiting for him to reach 5 years in the forum

That user could have kept the Bitcoin theymos sent him, but he didn't. So theymos' feedback is appropriate. I don't think it was necessary for many other users to also add positive feedback though.

Quote from: hugeblack on May 17, 2023, 08:49:36 AM

Therefore, @Hhampuz and @Royse777 must compensate the company for the past weeks or at least pay to developer (out of their own money) to create a bot to verify that users in the campaign do not modify them signature during the campaign period, any modification will be sent to the campaign manager.

I made a bot to check this, but it's not public yet. See loyce.club/signatures/ for the current entries. I'm still in doubt if I should charge for it's usage: on the one hand I like catching cheaters, but on the other hand campaign managers aren't charities.

Quote from: rby on May 17, 2023, 09:51:34 AM

Duelbits employs about 112 participants which would make it difficult for Hhampuz to notice

I never understood why so many campaigns choose the same campaign manager, instead of hiring someone who's dedicated to just their campaign. It's basically like someone who only shows up for work half the time, and his boss doesn't notice it for weeks until an other employee tells on him.