I've participated in many scam accusation threads.
I don't understand why you need to state something to prove your worth, do you need an approval? None of us are unknown and nothing to prove or approve to each others.
I'm defending OP because of the way coinplay has handled the situation.
They agreed to use askgamblers. Askgamblers ruled in favor of OP. Coinplay didn't pay and just stopped posting.
Let me say that again:
They agreed to use askgamblers.
Askgamblers ruled in favor of OP.
Coinplay didn't pay and just stopped posting.
It's obvious, you and me are not seeing a thing from the same angle. Whatever is your reason to give every benefit of doubt to the OP [it's like you were there when OP was creating the account and gambling on the site] but not co-operating with askgamblers from coinplay is true and the same way the response from the licenses provider is true too [not matter how you justify their response].
Askgamblers closed the case because they did not receive enough information from Coinplay, not that they were approving OP's case and certifying the case is a win in favour of the OP. The license provide
in fact provided a good reason [although we don't know how was it verified] but it seems you are blinded in that part but very active in askgamblers part. Indicates again, you and me are not seeing the case from the same page.
Do you really think I am defending a specific casino?
Yes. You're defending coinplay. You're doing it this very post.
This very post is about Coinplay, not about sportsbet.io, Stake.com, Rollbit, Duelbits, FortuneJack. What do you expect, to talk about all on this thread?