Quote from: Doan9269 on June 14, 2023, 08:58:17 AM

Quote from: LUCKMCFLY on May 24, 2023, 04:35:07 AM

Quote from: borovichok on May 05, 2023, 05:22:14 AM

Quote from: LUCKMCFLY on May 05, 2023, 12:57:02 AM

In a relevant problem when casinos are suspicious or suspend accounts or block, it is very difficult for the player in question to have reasons to win those cases,they would have to open up a lot to be able to accept that the casino was wrong, but I start from a premise, if the casino Makes a Mistake, the casino quickly assumes and removes the player's balance, but if the player makes a mistake?I have not seen cases where the casino makes returns because there was an error and the Player asked for a lot of money and it was returned to him, I have not seen that, and I think that Something like that has not happened.

Placing claims against casino sites is a complete waste of time, given that you cannot sue a whole firm for a simple KYC issue; you must have sufficient grounds to prosecute them, and your chances of success are only 20%. They are built in such a way that only the gamblers are expected to be incorrect. Casino is well-known around the world, and it's even more astonishing to watch the judges playing casino games. KYC standards are required for the secure withdrawal of earnings accumulated from casino games played. It is the only proof that one is the owner of that participant account; failing to pass KYC indicates that gambling accounts have been hacked.

Yes, the truth is that the ability of a player or players to succeed when they accuse a casino are very low, unless the casino has many gfailures not only with that player but with others, it is the only way that can be given to know the details and have a chance of being successful,but when they are casinos with a high reputation and trust, it is illegal to do so, you will not be successful because these casinos have already established their processes in a very transparent way,and also a casino with a high reputation and trust does not It will be clouded by a case where the majority are mistakes by a player.

Before any casino will set for launch and go into operations, they would have looked into many aspects to where gamblers are having challenges with using online casinos and try to fix as many as possible, yet the gamblers on their own way will always try to make use of the casinos to their own take and finds it more attractive but some few will still make it an attempt to go against their wishes thinking the casinos will recognize them and pave way, while everything had been stated already in their policy and terms which the casinos will never shift ground except the gambler comply to theirs.

Normally, casinos will always take people's opinions into consideration, but it is obvious that for a player to get a centralized, reliable casino without KYC, I think it is not possible, because the hard mechanism of KYC will always be present in them, Only here the platform that I know is very good without KYC is freebitco.in, otherwise I think that all casinos have the KYC requirement, sometimes the KYC requirement for a casino is mandatory, because governments force that if there is not KYC there are no licenses and there are no permits and they are closed, and lose a business model, because I think that the casino prefers to lose some clients than its business.

I don't know if in the future things regarding KYC and the casino will change, but they should, anonymity and privacy for some players is everything.