now let me make this as clear as possible
you've already made yourself perfectly clear i understand what you have been saying.
you can upgrade/downgrade/change/reinforce the rules again, without causing a fork.
who is "you"?
the only option is not to only make changes on an altcoin
ok. if you say so franky.
stop with the crap of pretending that the only option is to create another network.. stop telling people to use another network if they dislike what bitcoin has been broken into. there is another option. fix the exploit
you keep saying do this and do that. who do you expect to do that. like "fix the exploit" who are you asking to do that exactly? me? i'm not a bitcoin developer so how am i supposed to fix it?
your falling into the same dumb scripts as what doomad is recruiting people to say. dont fall into the dumb trap
i highly doubt, franky, that we are going to see anyone do anything about this whole situation. because if something was going to be done, it would have already been done. not waiting around for weeks and months while the blockchain fills up with useless junk...they would have put a lid on it right away. no need for waiting around.
there are ways to fix the exploit without needing to move to another network
putting limits on lengths of witness per transaction again will just as nutildah admits grandfather old memes and json crap(we are stuck holding that old data) but it pretends new transactions from including long useless data
also having rules again to expect certain validatable data per opcode/sigop use where the bytes need to meet a specification/format or be associated with a certain policy would mean even short junk would get rejected becasue it isnt a script/signature
you're living in a fantasy land at this point if you think they are going to do all of that. there's simply no way that's going to happen since it hasn't already happened and there has been plenty enough time to do it. don't you think?