Quote from: Timelord2067 on Today at 10:48:29 PM

Quote from: DireWolfM14 on Today at 06:14:14 PM

Well, it's been nearly three days since the OP has logged on, and "payment day" is upon us with a little less than 6 hours remaining (UTC time.) I never expected these loans to get filled, and so far they have not. If you're going to try to fake some loans to your alts, at least make it believable by sending some sats to the addresses you posted. What's up with the lack of follow-through? Of course one needs to assume this lame-brain OP actually has BTC0.076 to transfer. Roll Eyes

Anyway, here's a table to help track the "borrowers" and their addresses. Have fun!

\|\|.User	\|\| Address	\|\| Amount	\|\|
\|\|.Amarjoob	\|\| 18SnZ6AEfdb6APiAwFNawqUkcaPq8qk3td	\|\| 0.006	\|\|
\|\|.Accesstx	\|\| 14hYd8Pn2apu6txZe3DFQwsxXbpodxzPXW	\|\| 0.01	\|\|
\|\|.masdd	\|\| 1MwfR7uGzoPAzN2XDeuYVbVTLNnRTEQW5W	\|\| 0.03	\|\|
\|\|.Dlogd123	\|\| 1FQVdKasUXfAa2iXCVVRoLBUdKGFQmd6x8	\|\| 0.03	\|\|

Hypothetically speaking, could a scam accusation be started against these users if it can't be demonstrated they have repaid their loans on time?

Granted some lenders have started posting they have facilitated loans "internally" (whatever that means), but how do we know for certain a borrower has in turn repaid the loan - especially if they were to say they repaid a loan "internally"?

Do we take the word of lenders, but not borrowers where there is no proof of a transaction?

If both the lender and borrower make "internal" transactions, can we even be sure one is not a sock puppet of the other?

They have been trolling and waste some time of their life´s yes. But they are not the only people trolling on the internet, that does not make it a scam.
Who have they scammed? To be fair, if A lend money to B its only A´s and B´s business not C´s.