Quote from: nutildah on Today at 07:47:20 AM

Quote from: Timelord2067 on Today at 06:59:43 AM

Meanwhile as you have no doubt seen by trolling my posts in other threads, I have been seeking out information on the exchange and their apparent use of a single hot wallet for all inbound and outbound transactions together with the reading thought the various scam accusations against the exchange dating back to 2017. (not to mention other users in those threads giving undertakings to have a look at the proof objectively).

The only time I respond to you is to defend people you are smearing for no valid reason, which happens a lot.

The exchange has two TRON hot wallets. You mentioned both of them -- the explorer you use labels them both as belonging to Okex:

https://tronscan.org/#/address/TJbHp48Shg4tTD5x6fKkU7PodggL5mjcJP

https://tronscan.org/#/address/TWGZbjofbTLY3UCjCV4yiLkRg89zLqwRgi

What does "various scam accusations against the exchange" have to do with baselessly tagging & flagging forum users?

Let's make things extremely simple:

- The two accounts both use Okex for TRON network transactions.
- The Okex TRON hot wallets have been (incorrectly) labeled as belonging to HYIPs when HYIPs simply use Okex to make payouts to participants.
- You assume that because these two accounts use Okex, they must therefore be not only Ponzi scheme participants but also alt accounts.

Is that correct? If not, what am I missing?

Does anybody else not see the flawed logic involved with Timelord's assumptions?

Maybe my post will get deleted again for off-topic

Well. If somebody get accused and get negative feedback and flagged for something they haven´t done then that its wrong.
So in that way I agree with you.

But I also don´t know what the truth is here, but I think Timelord don´t know the truth either to 100% and then its wrong to do give negative feedback.