Quote from: OgNasty on June 04, 2023, 03:53:40 PM

Maybe I'm just a non-technical dumb guy with too many opinions, but I honestly see no difference whatsoever between the "Ordinals Attack" and the Lightning Network Attack on Bitcoin.

Ordinals don't grant you the permission to use a nearly instant payment network with minimum transaction cost.

Quote from: OgNasty on June 04, 2023, 03:53:40 PM

They are literally the same thing.

They are literally the opposite. Ordinals require abruptly large sized transactions, while lightning makes the best transaction compression to this date.

Quote from: OgNasty on June 04, 2023, 03:53:40 PM

My hope is that this "attack" shows how dumb the layer 2 implementation currently is and maybe get developers to rethink a new situation that doesn't burden actual on chain users.

If this second layer solution didn't exist, I, as an average user, would have paid much more in on-chain fees in the last months.

Quote from: HmmMAA on Today at 08:32:45 AM

On the contrary , ordinals increase the security of the network by increasing the income of miners so the security overall , while LN "steal" fees from miners .

And complete indolence does harm the network, and "steals" from the miners, because it sets limit on how usable Bitcoin is as currency. Without second layer, it's quite unusable.