Quote from: shogun47 on Today at 04:51:33 PM

Quote from: Hvdv on Today at 08:02:29 AM

Actually, Roma played well. Sevilla tried very hard to win the match, but it has to be said that Roma also had a lot of positions. The match was fierce. Now I don't know if it's fair to say that one team was definitely better. The result will have to be talked about and as a result Sevilla was much more effective on penalties. Bouno brought the trophy to Sevilla with good saves. Good luck at UCL next year, Sevilla.

Maybe I wouldn't say definitely better, but Roma is a team that wins games with unfair means at times. Sevilla isn't known for that and when someone would ask me whether Roma or Sevilla deserved the win more, I would go with Sevilla because I prefer teams who push till the end, who don't want to destroy the game for everyone due to time wasting tactics and so on. Sevilla wanted the most honest win on the pitch, they didn't want to go into the penalty shootout whereas Roma was coming up with their time wasting tactics again to make it into the penalty shootout, which they then lost. For me that is a fair outcome.

If Roma and Sevilla are going to be the difference between these two teams, I will put Sevilla ahead. Because the Roma team is not able to maintain the consistency of their performance. On the other hand, the Sevilla team is performing amazingly from the past. In fact if these teams have some best players then the teams will become very strong.