Quote from: Flashman on April 15, 2014, 08:34:21 PM

Quote from: dunchy on April 15, 2014, 06:17:02 PM

For the sake of completeness, allow me to apprehend the current phallic state of investor's dividend revenue stream. Namely, the probability of approaching zero return on investment is almost in concordance with 6 sigma model, don't you think ?

Indubitably

However, the original proposition could be defined much more simply as...

1: Engender efficient utility of pre-existant associate intellectual and manpower assets in the translocation of geo-dispersed, sub-outerwear, genito-stratal, textile garment units into a strategic holding facilty under executive control of the enterprise.

2: ? ? ?

3: profit

Hmm ..well, if you're speculating the original intent was to prevent profitable returns to investors, then it almost without a doubt fits 6 sigma. As we all know, mining experiences a deterioration in performance over the long term, albeit unpredictably. If the aforementioned accusation were to be accurate and given the knowledge of mining long term variations, a 1.5 sigma shift would have likely been taken into account; thus requiring a mere 4.5 standard deviations to accomplish intent. This can't be overlooked.

Quote from: Flashman on April 15, 2014, 03:48:33 PM

Ah and fertilise the green shoots of innovation in a proactive symbiosis with shareholder expectations ahead of the parabolic adoption curve.... I see what you're saying.

Precisely, but further still; one must consider the relative perspective of the subservient witness on the parabolic progress. If the perpendicular tangent to focus places the intersecting reference point anywhere below the intersecting midpoint of the latus rectum, then we're golden. If it lies anywhere above our latus rectums well, I don't need to tell you what that means. Of course, this is mostly academic.