Quote from: coolcoinz on June 10, 2023, 10:49:49 PM

Quote from: be.open on June 09, 2023, 06:49:06 PM

Quote from: coolcoinz on June 09, 2023, 06:14:37 PM

Quote from: be.open on June 09, 2023, 01:24:52 PM

which were confirmed by the action in the form of shelling. Lol. Grin

Shelling with what? Confirmed by what sources? Russian?
AFAIK there are even reports from seismic watchers in Norway that there was an explosion at the dam, not shelling. US satellites confirmed the information with infrared sensors that detected a single explosion.
Also, according to reports from Ukraine the dam was rigged with explosives some time ago, long before the counteroffensive. This is consistent with the way Russians operate. They did the same in Zaporizhzhia power plant and almost blew it up when one of their mines exploded unintentionally near one of the buildings.

Washington Post ok?

I'd expect something better than an article from 2022.
I guess they're now equipping himars launchers with delayed fuse that explodes 6 months later. This reads like a story straight from kp.ru

Quote

Glad you're having fun. If Russia is fighting so badly, where is Ukraine's successful counteroffensive? Grin

It must be going well for the Ukrainians if Russians are blowing up dams and drowning their own soldiers in the process, trying to stop it.

This is direct evidence against Ukraine. Maybe you, in contrast, have direct evidence against Russia, in addition to unfounded accusations? No, you don't have them, and no one has them, otherwise they would have been circulated by all Western media. There is no evidence that Russia did it and there is no motive for Russia to do it. The best argument against Russia is that if there had been no invasion at all, then the dam would have been intact. This is a ridiculous argument.