-snip-
If the teacher is able to teach them consistently and also impart knowledge about the risks that will occur, then I'm sure their knowledge of investing will develop in the future. But if it only stops at the prizes given, then teachers will fail to educate their students in investing in bitcoin and crypto in general.
Consistency is indeed necessary, if it is not done consistently then the knowledge will only become a story rather than a guideline for them.
Although lessons on crypto investment have not been included in the education curriculum, it is also still related to Economics lessons.
This is more of a separate awareness made by teachers who teach bitcoin to their students, curriculum-based school activities do not necessarily go according and there may be limits from students who are so difficult to be comfortable with learning patterns like this, we all may have experience when we were students and sometimes schools that have curricula become very boring. Teachers can take study time outside to teach bitcoin and are not in the room as usual, so that students become more comfortable with up-to-date learning that contains elements of economics lessons as you convey.
If classes about bitcoin are not given regularly, the education about bitcoin that has been given by the teacher will not develop. The difficulty in teaching students who still don't have financial responsibilities, they will not be consistent and will be more interesting in other things such as games, so what the teacher wants to achieve will not be maximized without a tighter guard.