Quote from: franky1 on June 15, 2023, 08:47:56 AM

not surprised.. at all.. kinda funny how it was me telling you about the corporate greed of core devs wanting to mess with a full node to such extremes for corporate profit

obviously you want people to still have to download the entire blockchain no matter how big it is far into the future. it's not only the downloading but also the processing. so i guess i can put you in the camp that says we'll always need to download the full blockchain if we want to verify it is legitimate.

Quote

..
funny part about your other post about the 'if we stop ordinals they will just use stamps'.. here is the things you are ignoring:
a. you want to do a "lets do nothing" option. thus allowing the bloat... stupidity at its finest..

the block size is capped franky. and only so many blocks in a day. people can still send bitcoin. there is no bloat. the only bloat you don't like is higher transaction fees.

Quote

b. code can be created to stop these things by actually having format requirements and expectations for byte utility. rather than all this 'dont check', 'assume valid' 'is valid' bypass cludge. meaning there are ways to prevent wasteful use of the stamps too.. but you dont want core devs to code it... again stupidity at its finest.

so i want to hear your proposal about how you would block Bitcoin Stamps. let's hear it franky. or are you too afraid to explain how because then they might come up with a workaround?

Quote

c. for emphasis: you following the "do nothing" approach is a way to cause not just blockchain data bloat to continue but also UTXO excessive growth too..

i already told you if you keep moaning and complaining about ordinals and ban them then you are part of the problem because you'll then be forcing people over to something else like Bitcoin Stamps which uses the UTXO set. Which is what you just said you don't want!

Quote

you are part of the cult promotion group that want full nodes to be a commercial service charging for archival exploring.

i don't want them to do that but i heard that's what going to happen oneday if you can even find a service like that at all. obviously you take offence to that notion/idea. but you haven't explained why it won't happen. i'm listening though.

Quote

because you think core devs should have the ability to ruin it for the community due to their contract that requires them to get ROI on their sponsors investment..

they're not ruining anything franky. they're just servants of bitcoin. they will serve their time and then hand it over to other people who will then serve. you on the other hand are not serving. because you're not producing anything. not offering any product or service or alternative.

Quote

and i assume you think if you ass kiss their narrative you will get paid for your loyalty.. im guessing doomad promised you riches if you join the cult-speak
but here is the thing. if doomad has not been hired in his last 6 years of ass kissing(presume not by his requirement of sig-campaigning other scammy services).. learn from that. you wont get hired/paid for as kissing a commercial narrative. so no point ass kissing the commercialisation and breakdown of bitcoin which just wants to advertise other systems/services that pay middlemen per use which they think everyone should use instead

you always seem to come around to impeaching people based on how you think they are motivated by financial means. as though you're better than them because you own enough BTC so that you don't have to work... Shocked