Quote from: CLS63 on June 17, 2023, 12:22:08 PM

Quote from: Docnaster on June 16, 2023, 10:38:40 PM

Manchester United is still owned by the Glazers pending when the agreement to sell the to the new bidder is confirmed.
So it simply means that Manchester United will remain to continue with whatever transfer strategy and budget that's been put in place by the Glazers until the club is finally sold to another individual or group. United current sqaud for a truth needs to strengthened by signing more world class players which I think will be done in this summer transfer window regardless of who owns the club

Whoever owns Manchester United one thing is certain that they really need significant additions to the squad. At least this is needed if Erik ten Hag is planning bigger for the club for the near future. This season they showed how capable they can be by defeating even the league champion in Old Trafford. They were really impressive in home matches against top clubs in the league.

But this squad isn't still quite enough to compete harder for the Premier League and Champions League titles. Maybe you can give the Arsenal example but it isn't a thing we see very often. They have a really young squad so they also need some serious additions to keep consistency.

As a result Manchester United need to be really careful about their expenditures as well from now on. Otherwise they might find themselves spending a huge sum of money on an average player such as Maguire.

I don't think the team needs to be strengthened with more players, for me personally the ones they have are excellent, what they have to do is find another coach, I don't know to what extent the Manchester leaders are so blind, they still keep a technical director who has not won a single championship , they are all losses, failures, because I don't see any other way to call this club, if they are going to sell it, do it now, because it is a squad of very nice jaguars out there, I would dare to compare them with Chelsea, because they have excellent players who are up to the task, the only thing is that the quality of the technical director is very bad and if they continue like this, they will never be able to have good News, of course it is my personal opinion, and I think that many Manchester fans are Clear on this.

Quote from: Daniel91 on Today at 03:02:50 PM

Quote from: hyudien on Today at 12:42:53 PM

Quote from: jakdanyel on Today at 09:36:48 AM

I think having a trio of Mbappe, Messi and Neymar was PSG's biggest chance to go for their first Champions League title finally. However they didn't show the same performance about their manager choice. I was really not waiting for them to sign a manager like Galtier who didn't have a successful career. This was a really big risk to take for PSG.

They took this risk and it resulted in really badly just as I expected. Galtier was even contented with that season just because of winning the Ligue 1 title. But this wasn't a big success for PSG as they were winning this title most of the time already due to its being easy for them.

Finally they have a much more successful manager like Luis Enrique now but the problem is that his game plan is quite different. I'm really curious about what they will do next season with this new system and without the same trio as well.

It's a shame that Luis Enrique arrival, who was appointed as PSG coach, is called too late, because if the trio were still there, maybe PSG's results could have been better in the Champions League last season. As we know, Luis Enrique is very suitable to lead PSG. Now, this will be quite interesting when Luis Enrique designed the PSG squad from the start, all he has to do is build the squad as ideal as possible. Huge financial support certainly makes his job easier, so buying some quality players is no doubt. When PSG was coached by Galtier there were still many things that were not perfect, for example Galtier was not able to design a suitable game strategy in combining the trio of Messi, Mbappe, and Neymar. I mean the three players still look awkward and still keep their distance from each other and there is often a little friction. No wonder because all three have their own reputations that must continue to stand out.

Personally, I think PSG's owners should learn from Manchester City's example.
Both clubs have very rich owners, but Manchester City is still a more successful club than PSG. Why is that so?
Why did Manchester City finally manage to win the Champions League and PSG not even though they have three of the best footballers in the world, Mbappe, Neymar and Messi?
It is not enough to just bring the best players, you also need to have a top coach who will know how to create a strong team, as Pep for example.
Also, long-term systematic work and vision are needed, and PSG does not have that. How many coaches have they changed in recent years?
What about Manchester City? Grin

Well, from what I've seen of Manchester City, it's a huge advantage that they've always had, and it's not because they have Haaland, it's because they have a great coach, a Pep Guardiola who is always aware of everything and knows how to direct him, he knows by heart every skill that his players have and he has an incredible vision of the game, I don't know if you remember him, I appreciate having read or seen him on TV, but some statements by Haaland stated that Pee Guardiola always read every game and everything he did They predicted what was going to happen and how it was going to be, that's how the game was played, he really is a great coach and who knows how to lead his team.

Personally , if City let go of a great coach like him, I don't think they will have the same performance , they can have the champions as players, but if he leaves and they put another (without detracting) they will begin to live the nightmare of a Chelsea , which cannot be explained with that template as they could not have gone so far at one point.

Man City transfer news: ‘Agreement reached’ for colossal Guardiola signing after £77m offer lodged

Quote

RB Leipzig star Josko Gvardiol is reportedly ‘on the verge of leaving’ the club and has already ‘reached an agreement’ with Manchester City.

The Bundesliga outfit are seemingly in the midst of a summer sale, with Christopher Nkunku and Konrad Laimer already departing for Chelsea and Bayern Munich respectively.

Dominik Szoboszlai is also closing in on a big-money money move to Liverpool after the Reds agreed to pay £60million for the Hungary international.

Source: https://www.teamtalk.com/manchester-city/transfer-news-agreement-reached-for-colossal-guardiola-signing-after-77m-offer-lodged

We all know that any signing for this team will be interesting , I don't know how many ideas Guardiola has now, but whatever it is I like how he does it, it's a pity that a Pep Guardiola has not agreed at some point to do or that he is going to lead against Real Madrid, I think we all remember the epic confrontation between him and Mou at the time, when he directed Barcelona and Mou to Madrid , there came a time when Guardiola said, "Pu..." to Mou, the rival it went to another level and things happened in an impressive way, I remember that at that time the winner of everything was Barcelona, but of course with a Dinho , Messi , Xavi and Iniesta playing for Mess i, I think any team with its tiki- taka Would have beaten any Team.

Quote from: snipie on Today at 04:05:32 PM

Quote from: Daniel91 on Today at 03:02:50 PM

Personally, I think PSG's owners should learn from Manchester City's example.
Both clubs have very rich owners, but Manchester City is still a more successful club than PSG. Why is that so?
Why did Manchester City finally manage to win the Champions League and PSG not even though they have three of the best footballers in the world, Mbappe, Neymar and Messi?
It is not enough to just bring the best players, you also need to have a top coach who will know how to create a strong team, as Pep for example.
Also, long-term systematic work and vision are needed, and PSG does not have that. How many coaches have they changed in recent years?
What about Manchester City? Grin

PSG problem is they don't have stable and good management at the same time.
Ten Hag for exemple had a lot of horrible results with Manchester United in the beginning of the season but he managed to save the team and make it fighting for top spots. If he was in PSG, he would be kicked since the third match he lose.
The other problem for PSG is they don't have a long term solution to keep the team competitive. Short term contract with top players made that difficult. A 2 years contract is nothing other than stress for the whole team since the player will be threatening of leaving them.
Well, we should say that Ligue 1 isn't as competitive as EPL.. With all these reasons, it is clear why PSG fail each time while Manchester City made it this season.

Well, the truth is, I wouldn't give Ten Hag many flowers, for me he is not a good coach, he lacks a lot, apart from he did not win anything important, he did not win any PL, nor did he win the Europa League, apart from he made many changes, he is indecisive to the time to put a player, he doesn't know whether or not to buy players, he has lost a lot of high-level business, he couldn't convince a Harry Kane that he can get him out of the hole where the MU is in, so this type of thing is the that we see from a football fan's point of view, now, the MU fans who always defend this coach I think they got used to losing everything and not winning anything, I think the scary nickname of the "red devils" of the MU" they no longer have anything at all.

With respect to PSG, the fault lies entirely with the technical director, there is nothing else that can be said, they lost Messi, they are about to lose Mbapé, Neymar is a fact that he doesn't want to be there anymore, so this kind of thing They are the ones that can really be said that the Sheikh lacked decision.