Quote from: Cratoon on June 17, 2023, 06:54:07 PM

I am Seva from Paradice.in
Naim sent me a DM asking me to say something here.
I can only say that Naim and John worked for Paradice.in
John resigned on 26th March 2021. While Naim worked with us till 5th May 2023.
Both handled our BitcoinTalk profile. John handled our profile from 2020 to 2021, and Naim handled it from 2021 to 2023.
Naim asked me at least to say that they worked for us. Yes, they worked for us, and we never suspected they could be the same person. During their working time, they worked at different times while our support agents tried not to overlap.

Since you already confirmed the suspected alt accounts have had access to this account in the past, who's to say they're not behind it now?

Quote from: Royse777 on Today at 04:47:18 AM

For some reason if Royse777 is banned, how many will say CasinoCritique is ban evading? There can be another situation too. For some reasons if the casinocritique account receives a temp ban then do you think Royse777 will ban evading?

That's one of the risks of sharing an account with multiple people: you're all liable for anything done with that account. And if it gets banned, I'd say it applies to all alt-accounts that also used the same "shared" account.

Quote from: Royse777 on Today at 05:34:02 AM

Full disclosure: There are few other malfunctioning brains like you and they may agree with you.

Full disclosure: I think I'm one of them Tongue

Or else it may be you Tongue

Quote

I am (the person behind Royse777 right now) temp banned for 14 days. CasinoCritique is the account representing casinociritique.com. People handling casinocritque are: I, Mr. X, Mr. Y.

During my ban. Mr. X posted something, Mr. Y posted something and I also posted something too.

Since your brain is malfunctioning, you are going to say Royse777 is ban evading.

If you (the banned guy sitting behind your keyboard in this scenario) posts using the "shared" account, you're guilty of ban evading (which deserves a permanent ban).

Quote

The answer is not going to be straight forward.

It may get more complicated if not you, but some of the other people used the "shared" account. But considering how difficult it would be to prove that, it's much safer not to use the "shared" account at all if either one of the users with access is banned.

Quote

If casinocritique was not representing casinocritique.com but it was representing Royse777 then casinocritique was breaking rules.

It doesn't matter who you (claim to) represent: bans are personal, they're not limited to an account, but to a person. If I'd get banned, I wouldn't be allowed to create an alt and then say I represent the pope. I think you completely misunderstood how bans on Bitcointalk work.

Quote from: Royse777 on Today at 09:42:53 AM

how a business account can be treated as a personal account where it's obvious that the business account was not handled by the single person who was accused to have a ban on the forum?

Bitcointalk doesn't offer "business accounts". It's very simple: when you're banned, you're obviously also not allowed to use someone else's account. Just to be sure, let's ask the author of the unofficial forum rules.