Quote from: Tawsix on November 19, 2011, 06:54:12 PM

I'd like to point out that there is no guarantee that anyone in this thread is or ever was an investor and that they could be just causing a ruckus so they can get a bunch of computers for basically nothing.

I've already told you a way to start a private discussion with shareholders. If you want to have a discussion with shareholders, please start a private discussion. There are ways for us to prove the existence of our shares, but if you don't need us to prove that we have shares, you're just going to have to deal with discussions with the public.

Quote

Quote from: boonies4u on November 19, 2011, 09:23:31 AM

This is my first time hearing this. Do you have any proof of you contracting these people?

"Enlisted the help of" would probably be a better term to use than contracted, in retrospect. However, somewhere earlier in the thread I was asked if I had access to people who knew how to do the electrical work that was required, as well as the networking etc., that could help me and I said that I did.

Quote from: boonies4u on November 19, 2011, 09:23:31 AM

You should have put in a clause covering remuneration.

This isn't some sort of underhanded deal to make money off of SIN, this was what I thought was a better option to help the company without sending a bill to the company and cutting into profits and growth, in addition to reinvesting my dividends. However, if this is not an acceptable way of remuneration (trading shares of the company for my resources) I would be more than happy to write up a bill for the company, as would those who helped. Everyone who invested was profiting off of the labor and resources provided at no charge to this company. Every dividend that got paid out was due to this. It is not without precedent to pay people for providing services for the company.

I never said it was an underhanded deal, I'm just saying you did not write up the contract well.

Quote

Quote from: boonies4u on November 19, 2011, 09:23:31 AM

We are going to need much more documentation (see below) if you want us to give you any remuneration.[/color]

I will provide such documentation in a motion later for shareholders to peruse.

We should have received this documentation before having a motion whether or not to liquidate. Currently the only evidence that this wasn't/isn't a ponzi scheme or scam were the stats coming from the pool.

If you can supply the documentation and evidence (proof if you have it)

of every piece of hardware bought and/or used. (receipts, pictures, etc.)
of every hour you put into maintaining and setting up the rigs. (I want to see the original document or log you used to record your hours)

I would not have a problem giving you the remuneration to cover owning half of SIN. (if the math is close enough)