Quote from: piebeyb on Today at 11:48:38 AM

I think it was arranged by the Chelsea management to recruit Potter last season, even though in the end he failed to bring Chelsea to get up from their slump, I don't want to blame or ridicule the results of his performance, but we see that Potter's job is very tough being a Chelsea coach let alone changing him in a short time it is obviously very difficult, because he may need time to make Chelsea better. but unfortunately he was fired.

Currently Chelsea have to open a new page with a new coach with Pochettino, after all last season has ended so there is no point in discussing Potter's failures while coaching Chelsea, he is not a bad coach it's just that he needs time to make Chelsea better but the fact is he was sacked before the end of the season and Chelsea had to settle for a bad result in 12th position. Let's see Pochettino next season, can Chelsea get up. I hope Potter finds the right club for him next season Wink

Literally everyone thinks that Potter was a mistake and I wonder whether Boehly decided that all by himself or whether he had some advisors. Even then I would like to understand the reasoning when you are willing to invest over half a billion but then decide to hire Potter instead of one of the provenly best out there. They could have bought a coach if necessary as money was obviously not an issue.

But in some games I thought I would kick some of the players' asses. Even if the coach wasn't the right one in that position, some players played as if they would rather be on vacation and not play at all. All these big names for so much money and then they can't even perform well two games in a row. Potter is to be blamed for part of the problems, but not for all of them. They had severe motivational issues within the team and I expect some least amount of effort and motivation when they get paid so much money.