Quote from: Docnaster on Today at 02:29:48 PM

I would say Chelsea was quite unlucky throughout last season. Of course, we all know that every club would experience the same at least once in a decade. So for now it will make no sense if we keep pressing on the "WHY" of Chelsea's condition.
Many keep talking about Potter and Todd Boehly as the sole cause of the club's predicament while few speak about the way forward. I'm more worried about how the new chelsea would be in the next season, seeing that the club is already showing signs of a bad start by planning on selling Covasic and Kante.

The previous season is already in the past; we shouldn't dwell on how horrible it was for the players, management, and supporters alike. Instead, we should focus on getting ready for the forthcoming one. I am aware that Chelsea supporters and the board lack patience, which may be why Potter struggled during his tenure, they constantly expect a lot from the coach and the players, and when they don't deliver, they are quickly condemned. I've seen that many players will be leaving this summer. I believe that because they gave their all for the team, it's best if they go so that room may be made for new signings. Although Kovacic and Kante are excellent players, Kante is becoming older and as a result frequently sustains injuries, thus it is best to replace them.

If Chelsea doesn't contend for any titles the following year, I don't think we should accept anything less given the caliber of our players. We simply need to let the manager handle signing players for whom he has ideas and releasing others who are not part of those plans.

Quote from: Despairo on Today at 09:37:34 AM

Lol, Mudryk is a bad player, he should be worth around 10-20 Million Euros

He's 22 years old, although Benzema shine when he's already old, but his performance isn't that bad like Mudryk. Haaland, Mbappe, Valverde, Vinicius are young players, but it's not wise to compare Mudryk with them. At least he need to be Nunez or Gakpo, both of them aren't really good in this season, however both of them have show a contribution.

Mudryk played 15 matches, 0 goal and 2 assists, almost no contribution.

The Premier league is a very competitive league, and it is obvious that practically everyone is aware of Mudryk's potential. He simply needs time to get used to the league, as some players do, and you can't immediately condemn him to be a horrible player after one season. Can we infer that Hazard is also a poor player if that's the case? since he didn't perform well at Real Madrid. You can't just jump to conclusions just early because Havertz also struggled at start but eventually picked up and improved and helped the team win the champions league. Mudryk is a very intelligent player who has room to grow, so I think you should wait before drawing any quick conclusions.