On the one hand, if the OP is correct, you will receive the cheater's weekly payment, as the rules say in the OP of the signature campaign.
No, @nutildah report about @nlovric at June 23, 2023, 05:45:43 AM source ----> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg62447381#msg62447381 some posts delete at ----> June 23, 2023, 08:07:54 AM
and account banned at June 23, 2023, 01:45:38 PM
And nlovric (u=51020) case is over. Moderators agree that it is plagiarism.
I don't like those ones who hack or trade accounts, so it's great!
I don't like those ones who hack or trade accounts, so it's great!
I don't know if the reason is plagiarism or if it's a hacked account from the 2013 era although most of the accounts during that time were locked after the forum was hacked.
@OP created this topic Today at 02:22:20 AM serval hours after account ban.
I do not know what is the reason for creating the topic, as the account has been banned, and I do not think that the campaign manager will pay for a deleted signature.
The strange thing about the story is that the user was accepted on June 09, 2023, 09:14:20 AM while @nutildah give him a natural trust at 2023-06-02 (definitely a bought or hacked account, has taken to spamming the WO thread for merits, I would not include this user in any campaign)
However, in campaign management there is a rule that says:
▶️ Neutral feedback related to post quality need prior permission from me before applying
Did this member get approval from the campaign manager? 