Quote from: BitcoinHunt3r on Today at 06:55:50 AM

Quote from: asriloni on Today at 05:56:37 AM

Quote from: BitcoinHunt3r on Today at 12:04:21 AM

.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

It will be so stupid if there will be a team who will pick kane for 100m pounds.

Kane shall be worth 40m or a bit more. Mason mount priced less than him even though he was winning so many trophies with chelsea.
Sometime, the club can become so crazy in giving the price for its team. Totenham is a horrible club. It will never win anything next season. Kane is overrated player. Forgot this, kane will not leave from totenham.

Better to talk about another striker.

Indeed 100 million is too expensive but based on transfermarkt.com Harry Kane has 90 million market value, I don't know if it's a decent price but generally transfer market refers to this site. You know Mo Salah with a market value 65 million, this player is older and Harry Kane records a better performance of course the value is higher I mean more than 40 million as you expected. I think Manchester United will pay for 70-80 million and offers a salary 300k per week but the final decision on Tottenham.

I simply don't know why 100 million is too high for Kane, it's a choice, you should also forget about the market values quoted, the value placed on a star by the selling club is the actual asking price while the eventual price they sell him after the negotiation is the deal price. As for Salah, I wouldn't expect much from him, his performance has reduced compared to before, nevertheless, any club that would so desire him has to pay a fortune because his deal is still running for 2 years before it expires.