Human money is divided into two categories, credit money and non-credit money. In order to evaluate the merits of non-credit money, we assume that the ideal non-credit money is 10 points, then the animal bones, shells and other currencies are 1 points, gold and silver are 4 points, and btc is 9.9 points. And it can be said that there will never be a non-credit currency with a score greater than 9.9 points.
Mate this point of yours is very contradictory the way I'm seeing the pictures of what you are saying, to be honest your evaluation doesn't male sense to me mostly the aspect of animal bones, if I should ask what point does animal bones have to do with credit and none credit, what you did is a list, but I will like you to explain this stanza by stanza so that we can be able to comprehend your point of views.
I think he's too biased to Bitcoin when he gives points to every thing with it's value but Bitcoin is more valuable than what he mentioned. I think it's too exaggerated to compare it to other materials as they serve other purpose and have their own worth unlike Bitcoin. It's true that Bitcoin has many benefits and opportunities that can give to people but it doesn't really make sense to rate it 9.9 points when there's a lot of material that are more worth that are much better in Bitcoin. Like maybe let's save sentimental material that your loved ones gave you.