Quote from: TimeTeller on Today at 09:58:44 PM

Quote from: Wiwo on Today at 09:55:48 PM

Quote from: Josefjix on Today at 01:58:31 PM

The gambler priority was only to avenge his losses earlier, afterall he recorded gigantic losses, in my opinion the betting agent has no idea although he made faults because he knows the risks involved in gambling and still supports someone to gamble after witnessing the gambler losing steadily. They're both at fault, before gambling, atleast know the amount of losses you can take in and never to be too desperate to bet on games, do take time and mapped our good strategy, and if it doesn't go as plan, leave it, tomorrow is another opportunity to try again.

The fact that the betting agent have fucked up by allowing the gamblers to bet and play games on credit make it look as if the agent already have a forhand understanding with the gambler before that incidence for him to have allow the gambler to acumulate such debts trying to cash up with his loses which landed him into a bigger debt.

So in a clear term of the are at fault aince one can not blame one and leaving out the other since it takes two to commit such crrime, but only the business owner will determine what becomes the ountcome6of both of them.since the agent already know that it will be hard for him to recover from such mistake of allowing the player to gamble on credit which is against the business policy of not credit no play or bets.

Indeed! Both are responsible to what happened as this won't happen if either one of them didn't agree to one another.
As the saying goes, "it takes two to tango." So yes, both should be held responsible about this situation.
Since the money can be paid in few days only, it is possible to recover such amount.
However, that is, if the gambler decided to come back and pay for his debts. It is not much, so it depends on the gambler here.
Now, this is a very good lesson for the betting agent. Maybe, he is also hoping that the gambler will win and pay him as soon as gets the winning.
Unfortunately, it is gambling, so losing is more likely to happen. This will be a very good lesson to both individuals here.

You are definitely right on this one on which this two person should really be held accountable on the things that do happen because the did really make out that kind of agreement.Good thing that had made out by
that betting agent is that he didnt really grant up huge amount of credit on a certain gambler on which he had just simply assure that he would be able to pay on the time that he would mess up even more. We know that there's no such thing about giving out some opportunity for the house to give credit into a certain gambler unless if this is a VIP perks then it would be understandable but if not then it would be a good bonus or
feature to have but in todays business then it would be impossible for casino to give out such chance for these gamblers knowing that they would likely to lose all the way and all the time.
If they would really be giving those credits then they are really putting themselves on possible risks on not being getting paid in time because if a certain gambler losses then recovery would really be still questionable.