Quote from: invincible49 on July 04, 2023, 06:20:30 PM

As you can see, for my own curiosity, I have already dm'd him and will wait for his reply.

I appreciate the effort you put in, I really support you getting the facts on this matter. So this case could have key witnesses if there were people directly related to this case

Quote from: invincible49 on July 04, 2023, 06:20:30 PM

That should have been started off with RBY's first attempt when he came back to the forum after more than half a decade. Now that he tried to come for the first time in the reputation board to defend a known cheater, he got himself in this mess. I personally have no affiliation, nor do I have any reason to call him out. His way of defending naim027 and john abraham, the way he deleted all technical replies, threads made before 2015 got him in this situation. He has been exposed as a liar if not that then he is a scammer.

I think that applies to anyone on this forum who doesn't support the case DT is working on. Especially Jollygood. You can see it in my tags, assuming he can tag...

Maybe i will challenge him, if he can prove me wrong then please mark. If not, then 10 negative tags for it. You must know that the mistakes of law enforcers must be punished more severely than ordinary people, right? DT is the enforcer of this forum

Quote from: Plaguedeath on Today at 12:25:14 PM

There are couple things why it looks suspicious:
1. If Rubycoin is legit, why he need to delete the ANN thread?
2. If he's the real team behind of Rubycoin, why he not act to resolve the 2 BTC problem? what I see here he's more focus to get rid off from the negative feedback by complaint why the accusation bumped after 4 years.

So only "if"?

Have you come across judgments with proof "if"? I've never seen one, at least in countries that use positive law

Quote from: JollyGood on Today at 11:15:09 PM

As you can see, for my own curiosity, I have already dm'd him and will wait for his reply.

I am surprised you contacted him, that is definitely being dedicated to the cause. If he does get back to you I hope it does not bring back bad memories of the scam.

As far as the current owner/operator of the rby account is concerned they can continue lying and that was to be expected since naim027-style set the bar of compulsive lying and manipulation to never-before seen levels, others had to catch on.
[/quote]

Yes, what he did was absolutely right. That's the right way of judging, looking for real evidence, not prejudice.

If you definitely won't do it, Because it's not necessary. Assumptions alone are enough for you to judge people. I don't know where you studied law, but it looks cool and you're probably the only one doing a model of judgment like that in the whole world. Or do you have your own legal theory? maybe negative law theory?