Quote from: Timelord2067 on Today at 03:48:30 AM

~cut~

I can't comment on that, I don't know the signature campaign mechanism

Quote from: nutildah on Today at 04:16:33 AM

You got here less than a month ago yet you've spent a large amount of time concerned with the inner-workings of the forum, commenting on reputational matters and presenting arguments on complex forum issues there's no way a newbie could possibly have a decent understanding of. Also, 40% of your posts are in Meta and Reputation, which is highly unusual for a newbie.

From your post history, its pretty apparent you don't really care about bitcoin or cryptocurrency at all. Its not unique to see this forum as a source of income first and foremost (rather than a place to learn, contribute or interact on a social level), but I can see where JollyGood is coming from, even though I probably wouldn't leave a similar trust.

Regardless, its just a neutral tag and the way that its written would not impede your ability to join a signature campaign, granted a campaign manager sees your contributions as worthy.

So how long do you think it will take for new member to get to know the forum?

Other than the reputation threads there are no discussions, most members only reply once and they don't come back to see replies. There is no discussion going on in the thread other than reputation

In addition, new members are not considered in the discussion. Just like you who didn't answer my question in the rby case thread.

Yes maybe this tag is not very influential, But those accusations are bogus, I need to warn jolly, and he really likes to tag people based on assumptions. If this neutral tag turns red then my next step is: I'm crushed or he's crushed

I want to explain things with you, but the more I explain, the easier it will be for you to criticize me. Such a method of logical discussion exists in the concept of hermeneutics, but I forgot, I haven't read a book in a long time

Quote from: lovesmayfamilis on Today at 05:43:43 AM

It looks like the guy is too hot. I am also watching you, PytagoraZ.I can say that your task is to be visible on the forum (I'm too lazy to look for your words; I already spoke about this once). You manage to be visible, but your presence is too much in topics where, in theory, you should not be, if you speak about yourself as a newbie. Your task should be to study Bitcoin, not to "play" justice. Alternate accounts are not banned on the forum; apart from that, JollyGood has not pointed out any violations from you, even if you are someone's alt. Therefore, after three years, your tag will not affect anything.
But on my own, I can say that yes, I will do this: ~ PytagoraZ

alt? Still assuming without proof.

Yes... I need to criticize a few things, how is it possible for a judgment thread but no preliminary evidence? That's really surprising, and I think it's wrong and needs to be fixed. But Jolly doesn't consider me, because I'm just a junior member.

Though he need not worry, because I'm not a lawyer. But if he wants to defend himself I am prepared to re-read what I have read, and I think that is good in a discussion.

Note: I'm still waiting for jolly to answer this and bring evidence to his charge