Quote from: LUCKMCFLY on July 06, 2023, 06:57:23 PM

Quote from: delfastTions on June 21, 2023, 11:02:49 AM

Quote from: LUCKMCFLY on June 21, 2023, 01:46:40 AM

That sounds interesting, only that when an AI is trained with a human and with human logic the AI learns much more and faster, so all those teachings can be quickly digested by the AI, and if so the AI thinks much faster that the human being and once the AI has learned human logic is much better, I think that for an AI to learn something like this it takes hours, or the time that the human being teaches the AI, there it depends on the human being that I try to teach everything I can to the AI, of course in a very logical way and only in this way will the AI be able to overcome human logic and abstract thinking considering the risks and errors of the human being caused by emotions.

It seems to me that quite interesting is just the question of the correlation between the iron logic of AI and the manifestation of some kind of emotional reactions by AI itself. If the person teaching AI is emotional, then partly emotional reactions and decisions can of course begin to be reproduced in decisions that AI prints on its own without human participation. However, I think that the emotional component in AI decisions will still be tried to be minimized by its teachers. And then AI will become completely uninteresting, although all its decisions and recommendations will be strictly logical and corresponding to the optimal solution based on the array of initial data that AI has at the moment. But the dataset may not be complete and may not even include any element of information critical to the alternative solution. In such a situation, the emotional component in the final decision could just help. But I'm not sure that this is the vector of programming for AI that is supported by the majority of the scientific and technical community, which is now engaged in the further improvement of AI.

Yes, indeed, when it comes to training and including emotional things in an AI, it is something that we can expect, but having the intelligence of a person and being able to react based on those emotions is perfectly controlled by an AI. It is the advantage that everyone wants to have at some point to be used for any type of event, of course here we focus on casinos, games of chance and especially sports betting, since things in sports betting can be something that we can intuit or hit. Predicting, with the help of an AI, would be something far superior, it's like a Ticket to Success.

We think that the expectations of all people are that the AI does everything and wins everything as if nothing had happened, but that is something we have seen in science fiction movies, that is why it may not surprise some, because at some point the AI will be In this way, I do not know how the sense of bets and casinos will be, it may also be controlled by another AI, but if the chances of winning for a person are minimal, I do not want to imagine if it reaches that level, I weigh them here Things can be reduced that can be trusted more in traditional casinos than online casinos.

Its true that AI has the potential to give us a leg up in terms of prediction, but what does that mean for the honesty of these endeavours? Isnt the excitement of taking a chance against the odds and the element of surprise at the heart of gambling's allure?

The complexity of human thought and behaviour are ignored at your peril if you bet on AI as a definite winner. Artificial intelligence cant duplicate the excitement, tension, and adrenaline rush that come with gambling.

The idea of AI-controlled casinos is gloomy because it transforms a lively and interesting pastime into a cold and mechanical one. Further, the prospect of AI dominating such a field brings up questions of ethics and risk management. The introduction of AI into the gambling industry may have far-reaching consequences, ranging from exacerbated addiction to financial catastrophes.