So you can imagine what confusion this information can cause among readers, especially since it includes correct information about the name of the site and the official email.
I am not saying the info is wrong, but this is a mixer which is meant to promote anonymity/privacy that we are talking about, so the location and name could just be pseudonymous to protect the owners as well.
I think you remember what happened to the innocent Dev of Tornado Cash.
The two articles took the information from the same source in the quote I pasted, which is what makes its repetition contribute to proving its credibility.
I was hoping that there would be a clarification of these details so that there would be no confusion, because including a name in this way within an official list of information may not be as clarifying as it causes confusion.
I think those articles are mostly for SEO purposes. I am not expert in that field, but that is most probably the reason they were put up. If you look keenly on the second article on Benzinga. At the top, next to the title, you will notice that the author is Accesswire. Then at the bottom there is “View source version on accesswire.com:”
But anyway, the team will give us an appropriate answer.