Quote from: PytagoraZ on Today at 01:13:00 AM

Gan, thread reputasi emang horor ya? Kalo saya liat statistik yang baca banyak tapi yang komentar dikit, hanya orang-orang itu melulu.
Main kesana bentaran pulang-pulang bawa tag neutral ;D

Tergantung perspektif masing-masing, saya sendiri jarang mengunjungi board tersebut.
Perihal pemberian tag ke user tertentu memang tidak di moderasi, jadi siapapun bisa saja meninggalkan tag entah itu netral, positive atau negative ke akun user lain.
Namun, setidaknya theymos sudah memberikan semacam rambu-rambu dalam kebijakan penggunaannya ketika beberapa tahun yang lalu ada perubahan pada sistem DefaultTrust.

Quote from: theymos on February 05, 2019, 06:57:48 PM

-snip-
In particular, in my view:
- Giving negative trust for being an annoying poster is inappropriate, since this has nothing to do with their trustworthiness. If they're disrupting discussion or never adding anything, then that's something for moderators to deal with, and you should report their posts and/or complain in Meta about it.
- Giving negative trust for merit trading and deceptive alt-account use may be appropriate, but you should use a light touch so that people don't feel paranoid.
- You should be willing to forgive past mistakes if the person seems unlikely to do it again.
- It is absolutely not appropriate to give someone negative trust because you disagree with them. I'm disappointed in the reaction to this post. Although H8bussesNbicycles is perhaps not particularly trustworthy for other reasons, the reasons many people gave for neg-trusting him are inappropriate. You can argue that what he's advocating is bad on a utilitarian level, but he would disagree, and his advocacy of a certain Trust philosophy doesn't by itself mean that he's an untrustworthy person. DT selection is meant to be affected by user lists, and it is totally legitimate to try to honestly convince other (real) people to use a list more in-line with your views.
-snip-