Quote from: testigodehumanidad on April 16, 2014, 09:24:01 PM

Quote from: Amph on April 16, 2014, 09:08:47 PM

Quote from: testigodehumanidad on April 16, 2014, 08:36:31 PM

Quote from: Amph on April 16, 2014, 07:46:27 PM

bitcoin was the most instamined shit ever

bitcoin scam?

wow...look at the graph, buddy.

It looks...so not curved...and... not instamined. Not close, actually.

Care to prove me wrong?

96 hours in...looking pretty straight forward

90 days in...still looking COMPLETELY normal

104 weeks in....

oh wait...what is that is see? Is that bending up a tad around 50 weeks in? Could that be slightly MORE coins being produced a year after its creation? In other words, the OPPOSITE of an instamine?

What say you?

prove me that those graphs aren't fake

Let's be clear where we are at here.

You said, without evidence, that bitcoin was "the most instamined shit ever".

I provided a publicly available source that details the knowledge of coins and their inception, suggesting bitcoin was not. I am not a technical person so I can't prove or disprove it is 100% factual. However, I haven't found a single source that suggests www.cryptometer.org is "fake". The burden of proof is on you, my friend.

At this point, you should work on disproving crypotomter or somehow coming up with evidence that bitcoin was massively instamined.

i know one person admitted that he made 1000 btc in two day of mining

but i want to preserve is privacy

also it is very naive from you thinking that bitcoin was not instamining when it is so obviously, no one know about it back then so the diff was without a doubt really low for a very long time, this lead to instamine