Quote from: UniJoin on Today at 04:35:12 PM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on Today at 03:14:07 PM

You can see in fillippone's spreadsheet, which also has a link at the beginning of his same thread on the topic of Microstrategies/Saylor.

Another good way to attempt to calculate profitability and how many coins that any of us might have gotten with a decently long term investment strategy into BTC is to look at the Dca.com website in which it tends to show that the longer that any of us has been in the BTC market, the more likely it is going to be profitable, so you can play around with dates (up to 9 years) and amounts in order to try to figure out how many BTC you might have been able to accumulate during your selected period of time.

Thanks for the details. Always amazed at the ability of some users to search for information here on the forum. I once tried to search for something by keyword but was disappointed with the results (I used the forum search bar). The table you provided is just as great (whereas I could only find information on the internet about how many Bitcoins Michael Saylor had in 2021). Looks like I need to take a break.

Frequently, I get confused by the results of the search bar on the forum, and also I realize that doing a broad internet search will not even help to narrow down the retrieval of information to answer specific questions.

The main reason that I was able to get that spreadsheet information was because I had been watching fillippone's MSTR thread, and I knew that he maintained a spreadsheet that was linked to the first post (OP) of the thread.

Also I realize that sometimes I read information, and then I cannot recall from where I had gotten the information, so I realize that it can sometimes be a bit frustrating to go back and to search.. because sometimes you might hear (or see) information for the first time, and then you don't necessarily know that you might need to refer to such information at a later point in time and you therefore have to try to remember where you had seen (or heard) the information.

We also know that some sources of information are better than others, and there are some forum members who frequently cite from mainstream media sources, and many of us who have been in the bitcoin space recall that some of the mainstream media sources are not very good, and sometimes if we see/recognize a certain way of presenting information about bitcoin, we will realize that the information might not have good sources, so in those cases, sometimes we might feel that we need to go back and search for the sources (or perhaps find other sources for the information in order to attempt to help us to figure out which sources of information might be more credible and/or which version of events we find to be more compelling or persuasive.. and all of us are not necessarily going to agree in regards to which sources of information are more compelling/persuasive, but sometimes if we can at least agree upon the facts, then we might be able to get further in terms of having a more informative conversation that is at least based upon agreed upon facts).