Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on Today at 02:20:08 PM

There is a difference between a centralized exchange responding to police requests, and a so called "privacy" wallet enforcing censorship based on secret blacklists. There is no presumption of privacy if you use Binance, and they certainly don't market themselves as the ultimate privacy solution as Wasabi do. For every criminal's coins which are seized, there are dozens of innocent users also having coins seized because Binance have decided they are tainted or some other such bullshit.

Privacy wallets can't store data there's a contradiction in zkSNACKs philosophy. How many savers suffered when centralised exchanges designated coins as tainted it's a loss for owners.

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on Today at 02:20:08 PM

If you lose your coins, then that sucks for you and I'm sorry to hear it, but I will never defend compromising the privacy of everyone else who uses bitcoin to make up for your mistakes, just as I will never defend mass surveillance of an entire country to stop a single criminal.

Thanks you've explained it that way. I didn't reject it I wanted to know what they're storing when using Wasabi wallet. If we don't know data they're storing we can't confront them.

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on Today at 02:20:08 PM

Quote from: arabspaceship123 on Today at 01:07:39 PM

It's been mentioned zkSNACKs can't link incoming UTXO's to outgoing UTXO's so that's good for privacy if true.

This is true, provided you are lucky enough to get your coins in to a Wasabi coinjoin which does not have a critical flaw, of which there are many. But that's also the bare minimum you want from a coinjoin, and you can achieve it without using Wasabi spyware via either Whirlpool or JoinMarket.

Whirpool you mean Samourai? I've reported about how Sparrow wallet wasn't something I'll use because of delays in mixing. My previous experience means I won't use Sparrow but I'm looking at Joinmarket.