Quote from: Kauyaz on Today at 03:07:48 PM

The scoring system will seem bad to you, but not to other users, since you deliver any bitcoin from any source and in exchange you receive a clean one^{[emphasis mine]} with which you will not have problems anywhere.

That's neither the idea of mixing (1), nor is it how this mixer operates (2).

(1) Mixing usually refers to exchanging 'coins' (UTXOs.. let's call them coins) for other coins that are not linked to the ones you put into the mixer. A common use case for this: a certain Bitcoin transaction links a coin to your identity, e.g. by getting paid for a signature campaign. Both the sender (campaign manager) as well as potentially other users (in case that a public spreadsheet exists or people apply publicly with a Bitcoin address) now know this coin belongs to a certain forum user. By mixing this coin, someone can exchange this 'linked' coin for another, (or multiple smaller) unrelated coins of similar total value.

A mixer's job is not to exchange 'dirty' coins for 'clean' coins, at least if we assume that these terms refer to a coin (not) having been used for illegal activities.

(2) This mixer does absolutely not take 'Bitcoin from any source' like you claim, and that's the big issue here. It subjectively discriminates between coins and reserves the right to reject you from mixing. This makes them an unreliable business partner at the very least.

Quote from: Kauyaz on Today at 03:07:48 PM

Here it is blatantly noticeable that it is you who is trying to confuse users about the service. Users receive clean bitcoins with no Dark history, which is what the users want.

Again, that's not what Thormixer aims to do - in fact, they deny you access to the service if your coins have a 'dark history' - whatever that even means, since there is no definition of this, anywhere.

Quote from: Kauyaz on Today at 03:07:48 PM

After reviewing this list and its comments, I have to say it seems very strange to me that this is the first mixer that you include. Missing from that list are many services that uses the same system and are already widely known as mixer_money, webmixer, mixy, Mixerdream, Mixtura and many more.

Then, please do help me make the list more complete. Add those mixers along with a link to the source (ToS, FAQ, anything official) proving that they don't accept all coins equally, as a reply. I will check and add them to OP.

Quote from: Kauyaz on Today at 03:07:48 PM

And the most important thing is that I think you tries to make everyone believe that selecting coins is bad for users security and it is not true.

Sorry, strawman. We claim it's bad for privacy, not for security. I hope it's easy to understand why we claim that. If not, read the starting post of [Blacklist] of unreliable, 'taint proclaiming' Bitcoin services / exchanges again.

Quote from: Kauyaz on Today at 03:07:48 PM

I could not omit the fact that both you and the user n0nce participate in marketing campaigns for other services similar to this one, it can be seen in your signatures.

I am not advertising for a mixer right now, but even if I would, I'd only advertise / promote ones that align with the principles of Bitcoin and my own privacy standards.
There is no particular reason I 'picked out' Thormixer, it just popped up in this board when I visited it again after a while.
You can believe me or not; facts are facts though and in this case, it is a fact that Thormixer's policies don't align with Bitcoin core values.

Quote from: Kauyaz on Today at 03:07:48 PM

I want to say that you are users who are paid to make positive reviews and I suppose also negative ones, that would solve why there is no mixer except this one on your list.

That is a bold assumption and absolutely incorrect. Actually, it's defamation.

I have never done any paid (positive or negative) review of anything. Instead, so far I did 2 reviews of devices that I paid full price for, out of my own pocket. I also chose not to provide an affiliate code, to make my reviews and recommendations completely unbiased.

Quote from: Kauyaz on Today at 03:07:48 PM

I have sincerely searched your comments and you are not attacking with the arguments that you have used here any of the other mixers that use the exact same system that you are complaining about. Which leads me to think once again that I shouldn't trust your selective criteria since there are other factors involved.

Another (much more likely, don't you think?) explanation: people have limited time in a day and as we are not paid by anyone to review all Bitcoin services in existence, we can only focus on one or two things at a time, have a thorough look at them and move on.
Not that I need to prove this to anyone, but just to show that we already criticized other products before:

Wasabi Wallet: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5405325.0
Ledger Nano X: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5358741.0
Ledger Nano S: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5370521.0
Ledger Nano S Plus: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5376279.0
ColdCard: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5033058.msg57911569#msg57911569
Lightning Labs / LND: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5386437.0