Quote from: examplens on Today at 08:51:42 PM

Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 06:46:58 PM

Disregarding the current situation right now, I am inclined to think the opposition toward cicadasTR's flag is an exercise of good judgment. The flag was a reference to an accusation thread where narrative was conditioned and the evidences were fabricated. Will you say examplens is biased because he opposed a flag that's raised under a violation of ToS [refusal to perform KYC], a false accusation, and based on invalid evidences?

Both flags set by lesliegray and cicadasTR refer to cases where they received their funds.
So, cicadasTR case Betnomi 0.16090?? BTC no pay, bet history missing, geoblocked post withdrawal is positively solved for him and there is no basis for a supporting flag.
lesliegray created a flag on this Betnomi closed my account and took my funds (3600$) after I completed KYC also decided in his favour, the flag is defective in this case.

Quote from: lesliegray on July 25, 2023, 10:44:52 PM

examplens, you did oppose my flag as well and when I saw your replies to my posts I quickly understood that you don't have a clue on how things works.

I would say that you don't understand very well how things work with creating flags. At some point, you both ^{you and cicadasTR} created a flag for the same thing and asked for support. When we add to that his ^cicadasTR attempted manipulation in that case, you both got a question mark from me for bias.
I think I even got a PM from you, where you said that you made a mistake and that you didn't know how the flag system works.

I will not go further into this discussion. If you want to argue with someone and ask for support to slander anyone, I am not a good interlocutor for that.

If we talk about my bias, it can only be towards a fair and honest business. I have no relationship with Betnomi. I don't know anyone from there, I've never had an account there, nor have I ever received money from them.
If there is a real case, with unequivocal evidence against them, I will not hesitate to support the flag in that case or to leave them negative feedback.

I have never DM:ed you asking for your help, ever. However, I did make a mistake when creating a flag as you say because I have never done it before and I apologized for creating confusion in the flag thread-thing. I can really admit that I don’t know how that really works. But I know how sports betting works and thats why I’m here.

Never forget why Betnomi banned me and locked my funds for months because of this:

”The user is manipulating the pricing, all odds dropped before the kick off, the user has a strong mathematical and analytical pattern of betting in the exact position, as the pattern was repeated again and again, the user is a strong opinion user and is using strategy to gain leverage in the long term, which is against our T&C.”

Anyone who’s into sportsbetting knows that this is fraudulent behavior from a so called ”good” book with ”good” reputation. If people on this board isn’t aware of these simple things I don’t know what they’re doing here if they’re not biased.

I’m upset because I want the crypto space to be a good and safe place for people and that they can have their funds on these books without getting scammed. I’m a big believer in crypto betting in the future and to see all the people that has shilled this scam book not being held accountable is not ok. I hate to see this happening because it will ruin the reputation and drive people away, and the shillers are a part of it all. We need to make this a better place, and I was saying months ago that Betnomi is ruining the space with their actions. Guess what happened?