Quote from: zevrus on April 17, 2014, 07:32:48 AM

Quote from: byt411 on April 16, 2014, 02:37:11 PM

Quote from: Xenocyde on April 16, 2014, 02:32:08 PM

Quote from: zevrus on April 16, 2014, 01:58:19 PM

i switched 1 rig to test this service.
Rejects % is awesome. 15% or even more. It kills all the potential profit.
Could it be resolved somehow?

OK looks like noone wants to pay attention and add this to OP and site so I have to repeat myself:

Guys, Terk specifically said that the REJECTS RATE is much lower than the miner program reports on the upper line and that is caused by a communication issue between the stratum and the miner. Untracked rejects are accounted for by the pool, only JOB NOT FOUND rejects are real rejects and these last ones are around 1-2% max.

Somebody needs to put this in the OP and in the FAQs on the pool site so people understand what's going on. Also, Terk said he's working on a new stratum server and this rejects display error won't be featured there.

If you still don't understand what that means, I'll lay it simply for you:

"Rejected share er349fifw (Job not Found)" = Real Reject.
"Rejected Untracked Stratum Share from pool 0" = Fake Reject.

I dont think that this is fake Rejects.

Hardware rejects is 2-3 times more.

What exactly do you see in your miner? More "Job Not Found" rejects or more "Untracked Share" rejects?

The graph on the site displays what is reported by the miner's first line, thus adding all the fake rejects to the total count.