Quote from: yahoo62278 on Today at 03:06:27 AM

How is that feedback vindicating a scam? I actually spoke with Hhampuz about this issue a while back because sometimes it feels like casinos use certain violations as a way to confiscate money, but a very good point was brought up. They cannot share some information to all of the forum. All they would be doing is making the scammers smarter by doing so. Users with a complain can ask the casino to agree to a outside ruling from casinoguru or askgamblers and some sites agree with that.

You gotta realize that most of the time the accuser usually isn't sharing the whole story. They're sharing the part that makes them look like they were scammed. In most cases at least. Every now and then someone actually is telling the truth and usuaully the casino will fix the issue. I at 1 point felt like the guy got scammed but I don't know the whole story and gave the casino the benefit of doubt.

I don't think Hhampuz leaving a positive trust for a casino he has had no issues with is vindicating a scam though.

This is about as accurate you could get with the general manner in which scam accusations are being made (against any business) when usually other information provided by the accuser or not released earlier puts their claim in doubt at the least.

In all honesty, any notion that Hhampuz is using his position as a campaign manager to give scams the green light, is preposterous. With his years of management within the forum, for any allegation against Hhampuz to be taken seriously there needs to more than an aggrieved member not happy with positive feedback which he mistakenly sees as an endorsement of a scam.