Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on August 07, 2023, 06:10:30 PM

Quote from: Flexystar on August 07, 2023, 05:24:53 PM

Though I am very much convinced that wallet has proven itself time to time and since most of the legend members has it in the trust list rest is just negative marketing?

I previously used Wasabi. I previously recommended Wasabi. I previously vouched for Wasabi.

Then Wasabi completely sold out everything they once stood for by funding and cooperating with blockchain analysis in order to protect their own profits at the expense of all their users. They are now pro-surveillance, pro-censorship, anti-fungibility, and anti-privacy. They are actively supporting the enemies of bitcoin and directly undermining everything bitcoin stands for.

No one should ever use Wasabi again. There are far better wallets and far better coinjoin implementations you can use instead.

I am now more confused considering what other users are stating and what few of them stating. The fellow members suggest it’s just about the coinjoin usage that is being used by the criminals and thus wasabi is getting targeted in the process. I am sure this does sound little fishy because if authorities had any problems then they would have targeted other big mixers in existence however they are not because it simply straight business. If you have your books clean you get to keep the business up and running, if not then you become victim card that everyone plays around.

Quote from: Kruw on August 07, 2023, 06:13:16 PM

Quote from: Flexystar on August 07, 2023, 05:24:53 PM

I am interested to understand what is the current topic about leaked data and stuff? Is it true or it's just negative marketing about the wallet.

There is no data leaked by Wasabi Wallet, the topic is over coinjoin coordinators using data on the blockchain to deny coinjoin services to users whose coins trace to criminal activity.

That’s what repeating itself without any solid proof. If you checkout the responses from other users regarding their counter questions about the tech usage then there are no official talks or replies on the same. That makes us think either they are busy in sorting what went wrong or they are simply wrong.