Quote from: lepbagong on Today at 12:06:16 PM

Quote from: gurunanakji777 on August 08, 2023, 01:57:56 PM

While it's accurate that the current market conditions are significantly improved compared to last year, I hold the viewpoint that the bull market hasn't commenced just yet. Patience is required as we await further developments. Currently, the market appears to be in a state of consolidation. My faith in airdrops is limited, and even though bounties aren't offering substantial rewards, I've been engaging in bounty work for six years and relying on it for my livelihood.

Although indeed, if we look at it from the beginning of the year, we can say that there has been a very good increase, at the moment the situation is very different. In my opinion, the current situation is actually stagnant, and developments, both ups and downs, always go hand in hand and cover one another. Seeing as the economic situation has not yet improved, I agree with you that the bull market will not start yet. We hope that it will materialize soon, but it is difficult to predict.In a situation like this, I don't see that there are developments that are starting to improve; even a little improvement is not seen for bounties and airdrops. very far if you want to compare with the 2017–2018 situation, which was indeed very profitable. Even if we enter the bull run era, I won't believe bounties and airdrops will progress; it will still be bleak, and many projects are scams.

The bull market, despite having an unusual characteristic of a bull (which is typically strong), is indeed weak and not starting yet. Your comparison to the situation of 2017-2018 is insightful, though bounties and airdrops are not entirely the core of market vitality; they're like bonus features in a complex financial game.

Now, the scams and the bleak outlook for airdrops, this is an element of a whole other ecosystem. They may or may not be connected to the global economic situation, but they are, yet they are not. Many projects indeed seem fraudulent, but the reason for that is quite ambiguous. It's not simply the economic situation; it's the situation that's economical