What have the overall reactions been from QS and PN7?
Haven't kept up with everything, just looking for a general "ignore, deny, get cagey and defensive", feels like each has to be one of those three.
PN7 lashed out at me with typical QS nonsense (made up accusations of scamming, of sockpuppeting nutildah, etc) so as far as I'm concerned this is further proof that their alts. Also gave some absurd excuses that phone spell checker was the reason for common language patterns.
I will say up front that Suchmoon has been making innuendoes of the underlying connection for months. I also have good reason to believe he has been trying to get some people who are active in handing out tags to notice this connection "on their own". This leads me to believe the evidence is not strong (see OP), or has the potential to reflect poorly on Suchmoon for some reason.
Further, with the near admission of puppetry used in this thread, I would question your claim of lack of involvement in this
thread, and
this one...
It is clear to me this has been spread by Suchmoon since
mid May, this included by a trust exclusion and a neutral rating (I don't remember which one came first). This happened to be within a few weeks of getting a rule prohibiting the sale of KYC verified accounts without explaining how they are not hacked
enforced. It has long been my presumption the rating was in response to my weeding out this particular type of fraud in the marketplace as a form of retaliation.
I feel like you are failing to grasp what I am doing at a fundamental level
Are you Suchmoon?
No.
Why would you think we are the same person?
Well let’s be clear that you are not doing this and this isn’t any of your research.
I like to read the forum from my phone, and will sometimes post from my phone. When I post, I will often accept predictive text that my phone suggests.