Quote from: hugeblack on Today at 10:52:18 AM

According to the multi-signature address, the withdrawal was on the 9th and there is no update, so I think that the number of people whose money is still in the service is large. Does anyone know what the terms of the contract with @minerjones? Are 40k only for review campaign, or can they be used to compensate users if the service turns into scam?

I don't see a problem if the funds from the escrow were used to settle the user, regardless of the fact that it was initially planned for the review campaign. Which, by the way, was finished a long time ago. The problem is that it is difficult to prove how much someone had/tried to withdraw because there is no irrefutable evidence for that. All they have is a letter of guarantee or notes, but that can very easily be forged, which will certainly be tempting to scammers.
Also, after the withdrawal request, the balance going to be 0, so in the event that the escrow gets direct access to the private key, it will not be able to determine the owner and amount of funds with certainty.

Quote from: Billo_ on Today at 12:27:03 AM

I have read, Sir
It's still not work today and I will just wait for more official announcement.

This is not true. You haven't read anything, because if you had, you would know that the unavailability of the Whirlwind website is not the main problem.
Read again, Sir.

Quote from: Billo_ on Today at 12:27:03 AM

We will receive coins back if whirlwind money has given a guarantee on it?
How will it work, Sir?

The problem with the clearnet whirlwind page has been going on for over a month now, and considering your insistence on it, I'm pretty sure you've never used Whirlwind, at least not in the last month.
Why do you act as a victim in this case? Why do you say "We"?