Quote from: hugeblack on August 19, 2023, 11:00:42 AM

Can rwaltz.coom be considered as SEO spam. I tried to report these topics but they are deleted on the basis of topics, not account. For example, @cyrilmorris^[1] created 36 posts, all of which contain a rwaltz.coom link.
The same thing with Bitget^[2], which now has a signature campaign, but in the past there were a lot of accounts that created topics for nothing but promoting this service.

What is the appropriate reporting format given that not individual topics are deleted but banning the account.

[1] https://ninjastic.space/search?content=rwaltz.com | https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2594741;sa=showPosts
[2]

Quote from: hugeblack on August 02, 2023, 02:50:30 PM

There are some members who promote their services in all their posts without intending to discuss, and so all posts are considered spam because there is no intention to discuss here. For example, these accounts:

- Grace366 (rwaltz.com SPAM)
- Vivageneviv (Bitget SPAM) alt (ananyabushra

Well, I want to bring up this topic once more. Are there any ideas what to do with all that shilling? I still see sometimes posts with Bitget shilling and I'm not sure what to do with that.

Now we have a started wave of 0xfutures shilling. I tried to report one of them (NFTflow8545) for AI posting but my reports are still unhandled. Today we have someone with the closest name NFTking84530 who pretends to be not knowing much about 0xfutures. And we have also Eugene_1, John306 and CryptoFit99055 who shill 0xfutures also.

If not to delete all that shilling, there will be lots of spammers with it, but how to report that effectively?