Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on August 21, 2023, 10:29:50 AM

Quote from: Wind_FURY on August 21, 2023, 08:53:55 AM

It's going to be very hard to prove/disprove that without going too technical about it, won't it? Can someone, preferably from people who actually use Samourai Whirlpool, to ELI-5?

You want to coinjoin 0.052 BTC. Whirlpool creates five outputs of 0.01 BTC, which are each coinjoined separately. It also creates a change output of 0.002 BTC. (Ignoring fees for the purposes of this explanation.) The change output is sent to a separate account, precisely to keep it separate from your coinjoined outputs. It is called toxic or doxic change since it is not coinjoined.

This is done deliberately to keep your coinjoin outputs of a standardized size (4 sizes you can choose from) and completely fungible. Samourai and Sparrow wallets prevent you from spending this change alongside coinjoined outputs. You can then spend or dispose of this change in a variety of ways: https://bitcoiner.guide/doxxic/

Kruw likes to misrepresent this very deliberate design choice as some kind of critical flaw, either because he simply does not understand how Whirlpool works, or because he has no issues lying about his competition.

Quote from: Wind_FURY on August 21, 2023, 08:53:55 AM

But ser, that's just a website you yourselves maintain. The link at the bottom literally says to download Wasabi Wallet to try CoinJoin. Where's the other CoinJoin apps?

More absolute lols. "Look at this open source site which explains the pros and cons of every implementation!" - links to a site owned and operated by the Wasabi team which literally only links to Wasabi. Cheesy

Completely in keeping with Wasabi's utterly disingenuous behavior.

Everyone arguing with him should probably confirm if the identity of who you're talking to is really who you're talking to. I don't think a real developer of a more "serious project" would waste their time in a debate that will not go anywhere. Plus his latest posts have become like he's currently trolling everyone, no?