Quote from: ImThour on Today at 04:59:11 AM

I would love if you could have created some infographics to make it easier to understand instead of reading the whole post, I still appreciate the post though.

I'm struggling to imagine how I could do that without seeming affiliated to a service.

Quote from: Kakmakr on Today at 05:35:53 AM

I just want to know if you see the anonymous (decentralized) casinos as another method to secure your financial privacy?

Well, no. Just as with centralized exchanges, services which subsequently tumble your bitcoin wouldn't fall in the "Mixer services" category, in my opinion. If you want to go a la mixer, then use a mixer. Internet services listed are specifically created for that purpose. Don't exchange / gamble coins thinking that the outcome will be the same.

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on Today at 07:12:19 AM

Absolutely agree, but my point is the size of the total liquidity pool is not that relevant because nobody is mixing with every other output in the pool.

I removed anonymity set from both Joinmarket and Whirlpool. It's misleading and not important to begin with; both are very effective. From that point on, it depends on how many remixes you'll do.

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on Today at 07:12:19 AM

This is antithetical to the entire concept of privacy.

It is, indeed. I have added - "Funds blockchain analysis company and requests permission from them when user does coinjoin.". I don't believe there's anything more to say.

Quote from: pooya87 on Today at 07:29:30 AM

Apart from price fluctuations, the process itself has some additional costs.

Quote from: pooya87 on Today at 07:29:30 AM

The other disadvantage I can think of is the complication of this method.

Added both.