I'd like to see that list updated, I'd be interested to see how many I've fucked up on.
I have a notoriously fast ignore trigger so...
Also I think you should order that list (in the thread) by percentage rather than absolute which seems to me to be a much better metric as it can be incorrectly interpreted as displayed. Obviously those who distribute larger amounts will hit the scum more often then those that don't distribute at all.
Now if I wanted to start a witchunt, I'd start at those with the highest percentage.
Here's the update:
How many banned users have you merited?I don't think sorting by percentage is useful: thousands of users who sent only a few Merits have a 100% score to banned users.
Many users with a very high percentage have already been banned.
Disclaimerbanned users can still have good posts. Meriting them isn't necessarily a bad thing.
Of course it is,
outliers are easily identified and culled from the dataset.Looking at the data as a percentage rather than an absolute is a much better way to get an accurate picture of trends over a long period of time and the longer the trend line the more accurate that metric becomes.
The issue with sorting in absolute order is the fact that not all users are dealt an even amount of cards to begin with.
Also highlighting sources in that list would be meaningful as well.
If you look at that list one guy or girl was over 60% and is now banned.
and the next worst is at 12%
hell theymos is over 6% lets ban him he does not make the cut. please note that is a joke.
I am not on the list because I am slower with my merits and really take time to not give merits easily to a newbie.
Why is that because back in 2019 5 or more people I merited were banned so I decided to be very deliberate with merits to anyone under 400 merits.
I reall never give to a guy with 100 posts and 110 merits as I suspect them as a merit alt being feed by a few legends.
Thus I give a lot to heros and legends.