Why isn't it correct anymore?
I made another part bold: there are no damages anymore.
We can't be sure. For example, if the information from the onion site is correct, after the last known case (this one from decodx) there were at least two more deposits.
Did whirlwindmoney make any efforts to solve the situation?
Yes. They setup an escrow system before all this happened.
Escrow was set up for a completely different reason, in the end, it turned out to be a happy solution because all potential losses are covered for now.
I support your flag, of course.
However, I remain of the opinion that one should not strictly adhere to every letter or rule if they indicate the same thing. At least while the ww service is active with deposit enabled and withdrawal disabled. Every kind of warning is needed in such cases.