You are right, in particular there is a way out for this questioning, I could say that I am from a prohibited country, it certainly is, but why use VPNs to be more anonymous and have more privacy, but a person who is You can ask a favor that is from an allowed country, obviously you can comply with the KYC, but you used the VPN for the simple fact that you were in that country, because you reside in the other, so that is a way out, not very ethical but if exit, although things when it comes to VPNs can happen quite the opposite, the perxozna could have complied with the KYC and obviously used a VPN to be able to play from a country that is prohibited and then when he did it is considered a infringement? It is something that should not be, also if that happens, can a casino not pay for it either? I think so, and a person who complies with her KYC would already get rid of that problem.

The KYC thing will always be a problem, but a VPN shouldn't be, by now a casino should accept VPNs, but things when it comes to regulations will come a moment where they won't even accept others to play, and then that will become something where they can no longer be in a casino, because a person who wants to maintain their anonymity and privacy is something that is not worth it, in fact many users here on the forum consider it that way, they believe that Their privacy is essential and they need to take care of it, I respect that very much, and if everyone went with that trend, I think there would be more things or much more anonymous, the bad thing is that when they are decentralized casinos it is very disappointing to the players, because it is Like more commitment, I read a long time ago that a decentralized casino charged for each movement that the player makes, so these things are what can stop players , of course if he is a player who has a lot of money, well, no, but he must have everything those kinds of precautions.