Quote from: sompitonov on Today at 12:06:52 PM

Quote from: Coin_trader on Today at 11:14:30 AM

Quote from: sompitonov on Today at 10:05:17 AM

Sorry for my directness, but after your words you can forget about your ETH. Even if you haven’t broken any rules, an unscrupulous gambling site can simply take them away from you, despite risking its reputation.

When it comes to amounts like 8.38 ETH, almost any gambling platform can go to great lengths to prevent you from withdrawing them from there. And even if you are a long-time user for them with a large number of attracted friends. This does not matter for the gambling platform. In any case, by creating such topics, you show that gambling sites cannot be trusted, especially when you have such a large amount. It is better to scatter (diversify) across other gambling platforms so that they are smaller and the site is not tempted to not return them to you under various pretexts (be it KYC or something else).

This is not true. Reputable casino can payout instantly more than that amount as long as you can provide necessary documents for KYC which ToS stated. They are not using the ToS just to hold the withdrawal but rather it’s requirements by their license since it’s already huge amount that coincides the AML rules. Crypto.games is one of long time running casino here in the forum and he has a choice to claim the balance.

For me, if he has nothing to hide then he should just do KYC to claim his funds or forget about his funds if he is not willing to comply. This user is using the forum to get sympathy about his case while the answer to his problem is already given on his narration.

I mean that the OP said that he won't go through the KYC and won't provide his data under any circumstances, then he won't be given an ETH. Of course, with such a quantity of ETH, the OP falls under AML. After all, if it didn’t exist, money would be laundered through Crypto.games. They don't want this, so everything is logical. Therefore, I think that it is 99% that the funds will not be returned to him, I have nothing more to add, but the principles for the OP are worth more than that.

Your whole statement claim that any casino will hold that kind amount and use KYC as delaying tactics to avoid paying out user while ToS is already given before user create an account or in OP case, He doesn’t check the casino ToS for a long time and only rely to the old rules when he started to use crypto.games.

I will not react in your statement if you will contruct it the way you constructed now because it’s interpreted by that since you suggest to diversify assets which is useless since casino can ask KYC anytime no matter what is the amount involved if you can read the ToS under AML policy. Guy like OP should stay away completely on centralized casino that has a tendency to apply KYC to all its customer.