Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:41:49 AM

Quote from: Peeps Place on Today at 06:59:33 AM

The only thing going against them is not having a signature campaign here at bitcointalk until recently.

Having or not having a signature campaign on Bitcointalk is certainly not a factor I consider. In fact, I think there are many casinos on my list that never had one if I am not mistaken.

Quote from: Peeps Place on Today at 06:59:33 AM

Stake and Sportsbet have all kinds of accusations against them. Why does that get overlooked? I’m not saying all are legitimate.

I used the word 'valid' in my previous reply, which means more or less as your term legitimate. I don't consider the existence of a scam accusation without valid proof as a scam. You can be certain that if I find and get involved in a thread in Scam Accusation and side with the accuser that I will remove that casino no matter its name or popularity. I haven't been to the Scam Accusation board in some time, but will check it in the near future.

Quote from: Peeps Place on Today at 06:59:33 AM

Look at scam accusations. There’s nothing against Nitrobetting in all of 2022 and 2023 as far as I know.

I think we had this conversation already. I don't think many people on this forum use Nitrobetting nearly as much as Stake or Sportsbet, hence the missing accusations. It's also possible that Nitrobetting has changed or are changing from their dubious past.

My only contention is that there are no valid reasons for the omission of Nitrobetting. I try to keep an eye on all accusations and will inquire if unsure. It’s your thread and I think it’s very valuable. It’s ultimately your decision on books that you publish even if I disagree.