Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on Today at 09:59:53 AM

Quote from: Kruw on Today at 09:27:58 AM

Since no one on this thread is coordinating coinjoins themselves, it's proof that all the petitioners don't actually want to circumvent coinjoin censorship, they just want to harm the reputation of open source software.

Lol. As if there are no other solutions proposed? Just because we don't run our own Wasabi coordinators, it doesn't mean we don't get along other privacy options.

^ More proof of the petitioners trying to harm the reputation of open source software. BlackHatCoiner started a self moderated topic so he could lie about Wasabi without anyone being able to post to expose his lies. This is truly cowardly behavior.

Quote from: ETFbitcoin on Today at 11:58:42 AM

Quote from: Kruw on Today at 09:27:58 AM

Since no one on this thread is coordinating coinjoins themselves, it's proof that all the petitioners don't actually want to circumvent coinjoin censorship, they just want to harm the reputation of open source software.

Isn't it obvious most people doesn't have necessary skill or experience to run their own server (whether it's WabiSabi coordinator or something else)?

Saying "I don't want to run a node" isn't a good excuse for not using Bitcoin. If you don't have the necessary skill or experience to run your own node, you can continue to use Paypal just like the rest of the fiat slaves.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 03:45:25 PM

You have what it takes to one day make it in politics. You are excellent in avoiding to talk about problems and immediately attempting to switch attention to something or someone else. You answer questions with counter questions to avoid the answering of questions. I knew exactly what I wanted to hear when I asked you about your blockchain analysis partners (yes, I said partners) and what my next response would be like. And because you have no answers, you are left with only two cards. Play the we are open-source card or everyone can run their own coordinator card, again because the software is open-source. Despite you knowing that's not the issue, you insist on playing those cards. No one is falling for your bluffs.

I answered all your questions already so we could move this conversation forward: Since you can solve any problems of arbitrary censorship by running your own coordinator, why would you participate in a petition to have open source privacy software removed from Bitcointalk?

Quote from: Synchronice on Today at 07:28:05 PM

@Kruw
As far as I understand, because of Tor and compact block filters, chain analyzes companies aren't able to trace or spy on Wasabi users, right? Then what's the point of paying money to Chain Analysis companies?

Correct, Tor and compact block filters prevent any two addresses from being linked together by network connections. However, paying money to a chain analysis company can still be useful even when checking a single unspent addresses because even an address that is not linked to others could have been reported as a direct recipient of stolen money.